| To: | REALbasic Betas <realbasic-betas at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Ability to have more than one LValue |
| From: | Will Leshner <leshner at ljug dot com> |
| Date: | Sat, 27 Jul 2002 10:08:18 -0700 |
Actually, I do like the idea. I was concerned that it was an advanced
feature that could be more confusing to new users than it was worth. But
you make very good points that I hadn't considered. I could easily
persuaded that RB should allow multiple returns.
On Saturday, July 27, 2002, at 07:05 AM, Guyren G Howe wrote: Doing this stuff with ByRef is basically a kludge, IMHO. It is much cleaner and more natural to allow multiple returns from functions. I don't know whymore languages don't have it. Care to elaborate on why you don't like this idea? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RBScript Context -- suite --, Michel Scriban |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Nathan Fisher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Ability to have more than one LValue, Guyren G Howe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Ability to have more than one Lvalue, David Shaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |