Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value

realbasic-betas.mbox

Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value

from Mars Saxman

To:	REALbasic Betas <realbasic-betas at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject:	Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value
From:	Mars Saxman <mars at realsoftware dot com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Jul 2002 11:10:32 -0700

virtual1 at pitnet dot net wrote:

> Does something like this have a prayer of being implemented?  As far as
> I can tell, it doesn't break existing syntax.

It's certainly possible, but it would be a good bit of work. It doesn't
break the syntax, but it's a radical change in semantics.

Mars Saxman
REAL Software

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Nathan Fisher Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Charles Yeomans Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Mars Saxman <= Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Kevin Ballard Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Geoff Canyon Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Stéphane Pinel Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Theodore H . Smith Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Emile Schwarz Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, John H . Guillory Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, hikyaku Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Nathan Fisher

Previous by Date:	Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Charles Yeomans
Next by Date:	Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Kevin Ballard
Previous by Thread:	Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Charles Yeomans
Next by Thread:	Re: Ability to have more then one Return Value, Kevin Ballard
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]