realbasic-betas.mbox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: new <> nil (was: Re: new folderItem)

To: REALbasic Betas <realbasic-betas at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: new <> nil (was: Re: new folderItem)
From: Will Leshner <leshner at ljug dot com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:47:35 -0700
I believe this has come up before, recently, and I believe that the documentation turned out to be wrong and Joe turned out to be right. Could it be any other way :)

On Friday, October 25, 2002, at 05:09  PM, Lars Jensen wrote:

Wait a sec...from the 4.5 Language Reference, p.311:

"When you try to create an object with the New operator, the application may
not have enough memory to actually create the object. If so, the 'new'
object will actually be Nil. Before proceeding, it is best to test for a Nil
object before proceeding."



---
A searchable archive of this list is available at:
<http://dbserver.realsoftware.com/KBDB/search.php>

Unsubscribe:
<mailto:realbasic-betas-off at lists dot realsoftware dot com>

Subscribe to the digest:
<mailto:realbasic-betas-digest at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>