realbasic-betas.mbox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Swordfish

To: REALbasic Betas <realbasic-betas at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Swordfish
From: Kevin Ballard <kevin at sb dot org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 21:42:25 -0400
Delivered-to: realbasic-betas at lists dot realsoftware dot com
List-help: <mailto:realbasic-betas-request@lists.realsoftware.com?subject=help>
List-id: REALbasic Betas <realbasic-betas.lists.realsoftware.com>
List-post: <mailto:realbasic-betas@lists.realsoftware.com>
References: <opr8on2rzg6pk8xf at deane>
The way I understand it, there's 2 options:

1) It will produce a CGI that will run on the webserver. This means it will act like any other CGI

2) It will produce a dedicated server. This will give the same effect as a CGI, but with a dedicated server so it's faster. Of course, a CGI is easier to use as most hosting places won't let you run arbitrary applications but let you use CGIs, but if you have your own box and don't mind having another process running the dedicated server will be faster (mainly because it doesn't have to launch a new process (i.e. the CGI) on each request)

Anybody feel free to correct me

On May 27, 2004, at 8:09 PM, Deane Venske wrote:

I was just thinking a bit about SwordFish and I think I don't quite understand exactly what it's going to do. Is it just going to provide a framework for us to develop web apps that will just be straight HTML? Or is it going to be something similar to Macromedia shockwave which allows you to develop in Director and distribute your apps to the web?

--
Kevin Ballard
kevin at sb dot org
http://www.tildesoft.com
http://kevin.sb.org

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>