realbasic-betas.mbox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: REALbasic 5.5.3 Availble

To: REALbasic Betas <realbasic-betas at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: REALbasic 5.5.3 Availble
From: Cortis <cortis at realsoftware dot com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:31:56 -0500
Delivered-to: realbasic-betas at lists dot realsoftware dot com
> Yes, furthermore I have an app that doesn't display the horizontal
> listbox scrollbar at all so there is no access to any other column than
> the ones that are originally visible. Same code work fine with 5.5.1
> (the version I am still using). Do you have a bug report reference I
> could add myself?

The horizontal scrollbar isn't showing at all for you?  What does your code
look like?  Can you file a bug report?  If you have already, what is the
number?



Cortis
--
cortis at realsoftware dot com
Engineering Team Member @ REAL Software



> 
> ~/Stan
> 
>>> Aside from the plug-in issue recently posted, I can't
>>> think of anything too major that can't be worked around in 5.5.3
>> 
>> I can teh fact that list boxheaders don't scroll horizontally with FC5
>> breakes all code that depends on it... and faking the headers to look
>> right Xplatform is not trivial as well. as well as having to handle
>> the prssed and non-pressed states  and drawing the sort widget.
>> 
>> Sure all is doable (in theory your own listbox is doable...) ... but
>> it's not quick to do it right... and it was OK in FC4 and broken in
>> FC5. It should be an easy fix for RS... but a lot of trouble for us to
>> deal with if they don't - if you use horizintal listbox scrolling with
>> headers and sorting and column resizing...
>> 
>> 
>> - karen
>> 
>> 
>>> Presumably not, as any changes would (I would think) require testing
>>> cycle.  So,
>>> as stated in the fc5 release notes, 5.5.3fc5 would become 5.5.3
>>> assuming no
>>> show-stoppers.
>>> 
>>> Presumably a 5.5.4 could be released if absolutely necessary, but my
>>> guess is
>>> that both REAL Software, as well as the RB user community at large,
>>> are anxious
>>> to get 6.0 underway.  Aside from the plug-in issue recently posted, I
>>> can't
>>> think of anything too major that can't be worked around in 5.5.3.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:27 AM, Killobit <killobit at earthlink dot net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Is the final version of RB 5.5.3 any different than 5.5.3fc5?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>> Eric Hoaglin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

_______________________________________________
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>