realbasic-games
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Timer Precedence (Using Multiple Timers)

To: REALbasic Games <realbasic-games at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Timer Precedence (Using Multiple Timers)
From: Seth Willits <seth at freaksw dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:59:20 -0700
Delivered-to: realbasic-games at lists dot realsoftware dot com
List-help: <mailto:realbasic-games-request@lists.realsoftware.com?subject=help>
List-id: REALbasic Games <realbasic-games.lists.realsoftware.com>
List-post: <mailto:realbasic-games@lists.realsoftware.com>
References: <02BC7581-BFE7-11D8-9248-000A95EED9D2 at comcast dot net>
On Jun 16, 2004, at 3:46 PM, Nate Smith wrote:

So, again, the real question is: Can I give one timer a higher priority than another?

No. Timers don't have a priority.

What you could do instead would be to have one timer running at 40, and inside of it determine whether a full second has passed and drop the block.



Seth Willits
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---
President and Head Developer of Freak Software - http://www.freaksw.com
REALbasic Guru at ResExcellence - http://www.resexcellence.com/realbasic

"All men are born with a nose and ten fingers, but no one was born with a
knowledge of God."
        -- Voltaire
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>