| To: | REALbasic Games <realbasic-games at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Quesa 1.7 |
| From: | Lo Saeteurn <realbasic at miensoftware dot com> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:25:00 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-games at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <BEDE637E dot DC38%larsjensen at rcn dot com> <615517468c1c6a2482dcf591d7a175a9 at mindspring dot com> <a0620070cbedf3c18c53d at [10 dot 10 dot 13 dot 4]> |
Well the slow down is happening in my tests in the RB3DSpace.Update
method which doesn't necessarily do only the rendering, but may also
compute some bounding volumes I recall?
OK, so 1.7 is substantially faster in some tests, but substantially slower in Renegades. What could we be doing there that's different from the simpler tests? Fog? Heavy use of translucency? Maybe it's not the rendering at all, but the culling (which is supported by Quesa in the calculation of bounding boxes)? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Quesa 1.7, Joseph J. Strout |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Quesa 1.7, Joseph J. Strout |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Quesa 1.7, Joseph J. Strout |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Quesa 1.7, Joseph J. Strout |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |