realbasic-nug.de
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Hilfe: RB verlangt plötzlichdie Professional Edition

To: REALbasic NUG German <realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Hilfe: RB verlangt plötzlichdie Professional Edition
From: Stefan Mettenbrink <S dot Metti at gmx dot de>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 04:53:02 +0100
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <3253889770 dot 38529666657 at [192 dot 168 dot 178 dot 100]> <1htahct dot wajvls1eepbi7M%support at monkeybreadsoftware dot de>
Christian Schmitz wrote:

Ich würde auf die deutsche Seite verweisen und ASH zur
Vertragserfüllung auffordern.

Hat er denn einen Vertrag?
Die Linux Standard Version gibt es doch kostenlos!?

Dann ist es doch kein Problem, einen Preisnachlass von ... sagen wir 15%
zu erhalten ;-)
(war mir nicht bewusst, dass die Linuxversion kostenlos ist)

MfG, Metti.


From  10 Feb 2007 14:06 GMT
Return-Path: <realbasic-nug dot de-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
X-Original-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Received: by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix, from userid 1037)
        id 653AE1967AC4; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:04:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on realxserve.local
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
        FORGED_RCVD_HELO,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.1.1
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (209-198-132-125-host.prismnet.net 
[209.198.132.125])
        by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9351967AB9;
        Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 209-198-132-125-host.prismnet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 8DC8F18FAC1A; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:04:36 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-To: realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com
        [194.25.134.81])
        by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0A418FAC0E
        for <realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
        Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:04:33 -0600 (CST)
Received: from fwd30.aul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp
        id 1HFsq7-0000Ws-02; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:04:31 +0100
Received: from 192.168.2.12
        (Ttt4l-ZaQefK+vPE6+PQH-kqzLwbzj7CvIJ58JC0P6GofxXPgGu0kd at [80 dot 139 
dot 227 dot 219])
        by fwd30.sul.t-online.de
        with smtp id 1HFspx-0vhWHg0; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:04:21 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: mm-systems at t-online dot de (Achim Kredteck)
References: <1htahct dot wajvls1eepbi7M%support at monkeybreadsoftware dot de>
In-Reply-To: <1htahct dot wajvls1eepbi7M%support at monkeybreadsoftware dot de>
To: "REALbasic NUG German" <realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot 
com>
X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 5.00.0035
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
Charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Date: 10 Feb 2007 14:06 GMT
Message-ID: <1HFspx-0vhWHg0 at fwd30 dot sul dot t-online dot de>
X-ID: Ttt4l-ZaQefK+vPE6+PQH-kqzLwbzj7CvIJ58JC0P6GofxXPgGu0kd
X-TOI-MSGID: 35781ee4-2231-49ff-b904-7b70f6c81b4b
Subject: TextStyleData in eine RealSQLdatabase
X-BeenThere: realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: REALbasic NUG German <realbasic-nug dot de at lists dot realsoftware dot 
com>
Sender: realbasic-nug dot de-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Errors-To: realbasic-nug dot de-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com

Hallo!

Hab vor, Text mit den Styleinformationen in einer Datenbank zu hinterlegen und wieder aufzurufen. Hierzu hab ich die Text- und die Styleinformation (sind ja beides Stings) versucht in 2 Spalten (Varchar) unterzubringen.
EditField1.text und
EditField1.TextStyleData

Nimmt das SQL statement der Styledaten aber nicht an. Fehler: no transaction is active. Was mach ich da falsch? Danke Achim


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>