At 8:37 PM -0700 4/29/03, Joseph J. Strout wrote:
That sounds like you're trying to use an asynchronous shell
synchronously. That'll be hard. Better to change your design: just
execute the command and return immediately (making sure your shell
doesn't die prematurely), and implement the shell's various events
for dealing with the results.
Can you elaborate on this point? It seems to me that if you just let
an asynchronous shell do its thing and return, you can't count on the
result as you won't know if it has completed its assigned task.
---
A searchable archive of this list is available at:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/search.php>
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-off at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subscribe to the digest:
<mailto:realbasic-nug-digest at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
.
|