realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A better RBScript

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: A better RBScript
From: Charles Yeomans <yeomans at desuetude dot com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:59:55 -0400
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20040929220700 dot 0C6CB4A1D5B at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <EE83A000-126F-11D9-8C2F-000A27B1C8AE at elfdata dot com>

On Sep 29, 2004, at 7:33 PM, Theodore H.Smith wrote:

I'm quite positive there's
another way.

There is another way, which I will do.

Hopefully RB will get a proper RBScript with SwordFish.

What does SwordFish have to do with it?

I'm assuming that SwordFish will not be limited like RBScript is. If it is, then there is no advantage over using SwordFish to hacking up our own RBScripting script server.

It is currently possible to make a shell script server (using RB like perl), just it will result in a mediocre result. I'm assuming that SwordFish will be complete, not mediocre.

It's probably going to be mediocre. That's good enough for the rest of us, but you'll certainly be better off writing your own web application framework.

Charles Yeomans

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>