realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Semi-OT] Call for Developers/Gauging Interest

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: [Semi-OT] Call for Developers/Gauging Interest
From: Norman Palardy <palardyn at shaw dot ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:49:45 -0600
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <415B4314 dot 1020504 at realsoftware dot com> <08734DBC-132B-11D9-8DC5-0003931D8DCC at componentx dot com> <604933B8-132B-11D9-BC5E-00039378202C at realsoftware dot com>

On Sep 30, 2004, at 3:55 PM, Aaron Ballman wrote:

How about a little pseudo-compiler than can take a header file, suck out all the constants, and write declares for the functions? To get the right library, it would plow through DLLs in a folder. That way, these things would be header file oriented rather than library oriented and we could apply it to other kits that come along. I'd help.

I've thought about this approach, but after having seen the Windows header files, I don't feel like writing a C compiler just to spit out RB declares (which is effectively what we would need to do). I mean.. they use BIT FIELDS in some of their structures. I've never seen that anywhere. Ever.

Really ?
I see em all the time in hardware related headers

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>