realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: String similarity

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: String similarity
From: Norman Palardy <palardyn at shaw dot ca>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:11:19 -0600
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20041030143357 dot 8A20751BE37 at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <2E31A05A-2A88-11D9-95A2-000A27B1C8AE at elfdata dot com>

On Oct 30, 2004, at 9:27 AM, Theodore H.Smith wrote:

I have a distaste for the academia, because:

1) If you look at the pioneers of modern computing, few came from the
academia.

Like who?

Steve Jobs?

Jobs is not an inventor of algorithms.
A great salesman maybe. But not "important" in the same way that others are.
He'll be remembered as the CEO and co-founder of Apple.
Woz was the computing genius early on.


Besides, I've learnt more about developing, from reading books that were written for a more practically minded person. "Writing Solid Code" for example, that is a very practical book. It doesn't use the academic approach at all, its all pragmatic stuff.

Turing was a maths scholar, Engelbart was working as a
researcher, and if you look more recently, Google was started by two
PHD students.

I don't think that academia stops people from progressing in computing. Just that it is overrated. I think, that if the two founders of Google did sign up for a course, they would be just as good as they are now. No more no less. They'd probably have spent a few years with less debt, although that really makes no difference to them anymore.

Doubtful
Google was founded based on research they were doing FOR their PhD thesis

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>