realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rs.field() vs rs.idxfield()

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Rs.field() vs rs.idxfield()
From: "Joseph J. Strout" <joe at realsoftware dot com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:02:42 -0600
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <BDD3E705 dot 17DE2%list at lajdesignsw dot com>
At 9:24 PM -0600 12/1/04, Luke Jackson wrote:

    I have seen this same behavior with the RB DB (new format). I don't
think that I reported it because I just switched to the idxfield and kept
going.

Well I hope somebody takes the time to report it.

Best,
- Joe

--
REAL World 2005 - The REALbasic User Conference
March 23-25, 2005, Austin, Texas
<http://www.realsoftware.com/realworld>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>