realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rs.field() vs rs.idxfield()

To: REALbasic Network Users Group <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Rs.field() vs rs.idxfield()
From: Maximilian Tyrtania <Mty at Fischerappelt dot de>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 14:24:53 +0100
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Hi there,

I think there is a problem with rs.field in the following scenario:

SQL="Select T1.SomeField,T2.SomeField from T1,T2"
Rs=db.select(SQL)

Now both rs.field("T1.SomeField") and rs.field("T2.SomeField") are nil
whereas rs.field("SomeField") is not. We currently have to resort to using
rs.idxfield (which is faster anyway). Still, I'd like to see table names be
honored by rs.field.

Best,

-> Maximilian Tyrtania | Mty at fischerAppelt dot de
  fischerAppelt Kommunikation GmbH
  Tucholskystr. 18 | D-10117 Berlin | Germany
  Tel. ++49-30-726146-728 | Fax ++49-30-726146-710
  www.fischerAppelt.de

-- 



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>