I will see if I can duplicate it again. It was quite a while back that I
ran into that.
Luke
> Message: 19
> Subject: Re: Rs.field() vs rs.idxfield()
> From: "Peter E. Barck" <sirujo at bu dot edu>
> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 02:20:00 -0500
>
>>At 9:24 PM -0600 12/1/04, Luke Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> I have seen this same behavior with the RB DB (new format). I don't
>>>think that I reported it because I just switched to the idxfield and
>>> kept
>>>going.
>>
>>Well I hope somebody takes the time to report it.
>>
>>Best,
>>- Joe
>
> I have never seen this problem. I use the new RB DB extensively
> almost every day in many different developments. I use mostly
> rs.Field().xxtype. The only time I use the IndexField is when I
> manipulate the DB schema. The only failures I saw were due to my
> field label mis-typos. -- Just a data point on this subject
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
> TI PowerBook G4, 1.GHz, 1GB RAM, OSX 10.3.4, RB 5.5.4
>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|