Re: Rs.field() vs rs.idxfield()

["P at NP@N" <panpan at sidoarjo dot linux dot or dot id>]

> Subject: Re: Rs.field() vs rs.idxfield()
> From: "Peter E. Barck" <sirujo at bu dot edu>
> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 02:20:00 -0500
>
> >At 9:24 PM -0600 12/1/04, Luke Jackson wrote:
> >
> >>     I have seen this same behavior with the RB DB (new format). I don't
> >>think that I reported it because I just switched to the
> idxfield and kept
> >>going.
> >
> >Well I hope somebody takes the time to report it.
> >
> >Best,
> >- Joe
>
> I have never seen this problem. I use the new RB DB extensively
> almost every day in many different developments. I use mostly
> rs.Field().xxtype.  The only time I use the IndexField is when I
> manipulate the DB schema. The only failures I saw were due to my
> field label mis-typos.  --  Just a data point on this subject
>
> --
>     Cheers,
>     Peter

Well have you tried ODBCdatabase yet? I had the same problem using
ODBCdatabase.

salam
-iggy


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>