| To: | "REALbasic NUG" <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption |
| From: | "Keith Hutchison" <keith dot hutchison at balance-infosystems dot com> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Dec 2004 07:32:30 +1100 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <20041230180609 dot 9506 dot qmail at server278 dot com> <A011B43A-5A92-11D9-BA8A-000A957CB4CC at desuetude dot com> |
What is a one-time pad? > > > > using a small number if iterations, it is weaker. However, there are > > newer versions that are stronger. It's not unbreakable... but no > > ecryption is unbreakable. > > One-time pads are unbreakable, albeit impractical in general. > > -------------- > Charles Yeomans > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: > <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> > > Search the archives of this list here: > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> > _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption, Stefan Pantke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: C++ Libraries for RB (A little bit off), Norman Palardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption, Charles Yeomans |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption, Theodore H.Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |