realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption

To: "REALbasic NUG" <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption
From: "Keith Hutchison" <keith dot hutchison at balance-infosystems dot com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 07:34:59 +1100
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20041230163639 dot 4CB46624F42 at lists dot realsoftware dot com><0B1E04FC-5A92-11D9-BD45-000A27B1C8AE at elfdata dot com> <067F206E-5A93-11D9-88DA-000D932CC652 at GreenRiverComputing dot com>
Could you use 22/7 with an agreed session starting point and an agreed
session step value?

> >
> > One-time pads eh? I've never heard of this before, it sounds
> > interesting.
>
> One time pads are supposedly the holy grail of encryption, however
> there is a huge logistic problem with creating and disseminating the
> pad. Basically it is something like symmetric encryption with an
> infinitely long key.  It'll be fun for you to read about, but won't be
> terribly useful in production I think.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
>
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>