realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>, REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Simple but mathematically valid encryption
From: Leonard Rosenthol <leonardr at pdfsages dot com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:48:30 -0800
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <880ECA18-5A75-11D9-81BF-000A27B1C8AE at elfdata dot com> <E3911502-5A7B-11D9-81BF-000A27B1C8AE at elfdata dot com> <5CBE4A08-5A81-11D9-BA8A-000A957CB4CC at desuetude dot com> <D132E5AC-5A86-11D9-863A-000A9585ABA2 at mac dot com> <6 dot 1 dot 0 dot 6 dot 2 dot 20041230092440 dot 03d6dd78 at mail1 dot netreach dot net> <35749CA8-5AA3-11D9-863A-000A9585ABA2 at mac dot com>
Smtp-relay: leonardvpn.apago.com
At 12:41 PM 12/30/2004, Stefan Pantke wrote:
I expected, supposed you meant something else like speed, applicability to
specific areas e.g. crypting of streams of data or crypting of blacks.

Both symmetric and asymmetric algorithms be implemented either as stream vs. block ciphers - that's not tied to the TYPE of algorithm.

Speed wise, it's certainly faster to do a symmetric crypt than an asymmetric one - since there is less overhead on the "key management". But again, performance isn't a choice for algoroithm type in crypto.


LDR

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonard Rosenthol                            <mailto:leonardr at pdfsages dot 
com>
Chief Technical Officer                      <http://www.pdfsages.com>
PDF Sages, Inc.                              215-938-7080 (voice)
                                             215-938-0880 (fax)

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>