From: Will Leshner <will dot leshner at gmail dot com>
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:43:59 +0000, Theodore H. Smith
<delete at elfdata dot com> wrote:
Will RB6 have an uncrippled RBScript? In that case, we may be better
off not reinventing the wheel by working around RBScripts
crippledness.
I don't consider it crippled. But if RBScripts can reach back into Rb,
I'm not going to use it anymore. I've already got a LuaPlugin that
uses Lua as scripts. I like working in Rb code better than Lua, but if
RBScript stops being safe to use, I'll have to stop using it.
I agree.
Would you be OK with a "Security" property? Something like
RBScript.Security = false, or RBScript.Security = true
What about having a "UtilityClasses" property? Really, this is the
thing I miss the most. Just to grab my tool-kit!
What about this RBScript.AllowedUtilityClasses =
"Graphics,folderitem,YourNeatClassHere"
How would you like that? I'm OK with that, personally.
--
Theodore H. Smith - www.elfdata.com/plugin/ - www.elfdata.com/forum/
ElfData: Industrial strength string processing, made easy.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|