Hank,
I misunderstood the numbers. I thought the 'average improvement' would
be the average improvement when one uses one over the other (and the
statement on link two seems to suggest it's how I should indeeed have
interpreted that).
It seems this is not the case, as it appears to be a worst case/best
case scenario, where the resulting improvement can only be achieved
under rare conditions. ...and even then the results are averaged over
all different OSes RB supports.
Ronald Vogelaar
http://www.rovosoft.com
PS: I admit the mathematical calculations from the first link lost me
from the first one.
Hank wrote:
The testing we did delivered the results as follows:
Mac Mac SuSE Windows Windows
OS 9.2.2 OSX Linux 2000 XP Average
8750% 140000% 600000% 740000% 166667% 331090%
The documentation says it can be up to, as this was what was
measured. The math used can be seen at
http://slayfire.com/OptimizerScience/speedtest7.html, you can read
about how this was done at
http://slayfire.com/OptimizerScience/speedtest0.html. The math is
correct, per NIST formula. I also cannot see what would result in
such a dramatic performance issue, however, objective, statistically
valid tests do not lie. If you want the test program let me know.....
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|