realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Version compatability of classes saved in XML

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Version compatability of classes saved in XML
From: Michael Bierly <mbierly at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:54:11 -0500
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=h67ECts0mW1PRB7861i2mbW1GsKXHQVuvmZFwY7xxSceM4O/fet4/kEq++ryyKlChRl0MBFrR2dEoFUDSu9UqozwFFvZiSxB0+JtpwOCrk6WMrdI/jBv8r90Qys0JxGgQ85gzHnU5Hmiysboi/1tkZV7Zwx/QUy7NI58DURiYNc=
When you export a window, class, etc. in XML format, does anyone know
how compatible that is across different versions of RB? I was looking
at one this weekend and see that mine was tagged with my RB version
5.5.4. So, it got me wondering  theoretically whether I could give
that to someone using 4.5.2 and if they could successfully add it to
their own project.

Anyone's experience here would be appreciated.

-- 

Regards,
Mike Bierly
mbierly at gmail dot com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>