realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Mach-o console applications

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Mach-o console applications
From: Charlie Boisseau <charlie at boisseau dot co dot uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:06:04 +0100
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <09e6b0a406942d96172ae84befc42305 at great-white-software dot com> <2C377E3E-38FF-49BC-818B-6961E7BEFB22 at haranbanjo dot com> <BA3E6267-2722-4B5D-B8CA-4A3BC8E8AB0B at otheroffice dot com> <60F5C0E6-D449-44BF-802C-4DC55B4B5227 at boisseau dot co dot uk> <53D6A4A4-26E6-4EF7-995F-A4546093EDBD at otheroffice dot com>
On 30 Jun 2005, at 09:45, Loren wrote:

it's actually your CGI example that i'm using and had the question about it for... putting the the app name in the url twice kinda stinks..

/cgi-bin/name/name

You can take the executable (and rbframework.dylib) and put it straight into your CGI folder - it doesn't have to be kept in it's own folder. If multiple console apps were compiled with the same version of RB, they can share the framework file.

--
Charlie Boisseau
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>