realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux
From: LinuxGuru <linuxrox at frontiernet dot net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:14:22 -0400
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <77aba9ff86522d18166365edfe4118e6 at implements dot be> <42EC1401 dot 7010705 at frontiernet dot net> <08cf01c59563$45b09af0$0100000a at KEITHXP>
Keith Hutchison wrote:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
Yeah B2 isnt very good, Im testing B7 and can say that it runs a hell of
alot better on Suse 9.3 than B2 did. Even compiles and runs pretty
reasonable. Be patient.

It's not about being patient, it's about valuing the beta testers time.
If your testing B7, and it's so much better than B2, then why was B2 even
released to the public.

If your on B7, then B7 should be the release for the public beta testers.

Keith


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


Yeah it should be public but its not my call, Im just trying to say it'll get better. And using Linux we all know what using beta quality software is like in the beginning. My guess is when R2 is released, the current linux beta will be too.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>