realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux
From: Bill Cavalieri <bcavalieri at lumensoftware dot com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 19:08:08 -0500
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Organization: Lumen Software
References: <77aba9ff86522d18166365edfe4118e6 at implements dot be> <42EC1401 dot 7010705 at frontiernet dot net> <08cf01c59563$45b09af0$0100000a at KEITHXP>
On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 10:03 +1000, Keith Hutchison wrote:
> > > <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
> > Yeah B2 isnt very good, Im testing B7 and can say that it runs a hell of
> > alot better on Suse 9.3 than B2 did. Even compiles and runs pretty
> > reasonable. Be patient.
> 
> It's not about being patient, it's about valuing the beta testers time.
> If your testing B7, and it's so much better than B2, then why was B2 even
> released to the public.
> 
> If your on B7, then B7 should be the release for the public beta testers.

Because B2 was better than B1, and the alpha's before it.  Would you
rather RS not make any public beta releases?  Some of the beta releases
have been beta testers only, others have been made public.

It is a beta not release, expect problems.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>