realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux
From: LinuxGuru <linuxrox at frontiernet dot net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 21:16:03 -0400
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <77aba9ff86522d18166365edfe4118e6 at implements dot be> <42EC1401 dot 7010705 at frontiernet dot net> <08cf01c59563$45b09af0$0100000a at KEITHXP> <42EC17DE dot 9070707 at frontiernet dot net> <BB77CC7D-D961-4FFE-9E5A-5F8F329830BB at shaw dot ca>
Terry Ford wrote:

On 30-Jul-05, at 5:14 PM, LinuxGuru wrote:

Keith Hutchison wrote:

<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


Yeah B2 isnt very good, Im testing B7 and can say that it runs a hell of
alot better on Suse 9.3 than B2 did. Even compiles and runs pretty
reasonable. Be patient.



It's not about being patient, it's about valuing the beta testers time. If your testing B7, and it's so much better than B2, then why was B2 even
released to the public.

If your on B7, then B7 should be the release for the public beta testers.

And all of this thread is in violation of the agreement you made to get on the Betas list. If you haven't been already Kicked off the list or chastised, you probably will be.

Terry

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


By simply stating that a newer beta I feel is better?

Give me a break.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>