| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux |
| From: | Yves Vindevogel <yves dot vindevogel at implements dot be> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Aug 2005 01:53:32 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <77aba9ff86522d18166365edfe4118e6 at implements dot be> <42EC1401 dot 7010705 at frontiernet dot net> <e5b160c30b8f4ecc4042836b98bf9bc0 at implements dot be> <1122843731 dot 16182 dot 54 dot camel at notebook dot projectsfromhell dot org> |
On 31 Jul 2005, at 23:02, Bill Cavalieri wrote: Ok, but even in Beta, those errors should not be there. They should have been fixed during unit testing already.On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 22:21 +0200, Yves Vindevogel wrote:How is it possible that you have B7 and I have B2 ?The download indeed says something with B7, but the splash screen showsBeta 2. Are you a beta tester or in some sort of a program ?Thats r2b7, release 2, beta 7. Once if makes fc, then I will be upset with crashes and such, but RS realizes this as, the Linux IDE is still marked beta. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux, Yves Vindevogel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A bit OT - C++ Compilers, dda |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux, Bill Cavalieri |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2nd Opinion Beta 2 Linux, Terry Ford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |