| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Instantiating object (Re: New 2K5 trial) |
| From: | Norman Palardy <npalardy at great-white-software dot com> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:39:41 -0600 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <E66B2B85-5858-45C4-A338-42CDFF8ABC3D at innernine dot com> <6f5cb228778072c5534ad8c81ffeebdd at satx dot rr dot com> <537B9BB5-CC90-4FC7-AD2A-2E6AD8F4A541 at innernine dot com> <bbe003f594749364dcbad65d97ab3cd4 at satx dot rr dot com> <a0620071cbf3a86fffc5a at [10 dot 0 dot 1 dot 4]> <705a87eaa63b5bb1e8aacfcda9509c9f at great-white-software dot com> <75260A21-427B-4BC9-9889-490862C8F4D7 at shaw dot ca> |
On Aug 30, 2005, at 4:25 PM, Terry Ford wrote: It was very stable, but there are some things it allows you to do that maybe it shouldn'tOn 30-Aug-05, at 3:14 PM, Norman Palardy wrote:Yes, but 55 did allow other things that probably should have been flagged as errors of one kind or another Maybe this is just one of those "should have been an error in 5.5 but wasn't caught but now is" kinds of things ?This amuses me as there are so many people that say 5.5.5 was the be all and end all and that 2005 makes things worse. I still use 5.5.4 for various reasons _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Call for Constructive Criticism (Sorry for No Subject Dupe), brian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Some questions and help about CHAT!, Stefan Pantke |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Instantiating object (Re: New 2K5 trial), Terry Ford |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Instantiating object (Re: New 2K5 trial), William Squires |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |