On Aug 31, 2005, at 9:27 AM, Joseph J. Strout wrote:
At 11:04 PM -0500 8/30/05, William Squires wrote:
This thread is about actually, literally, saying "New Object".
Apparently that generates an error in REALbasic 2005, though it was
allowed in 5.5.
Which I would expect it (RB 2005) to, given that an instance of
"Object" has no substance, per se.
I agree. Nobody's arguing that the current behavior is a bad thing.
I think this thread has outlived its usefulness.
Then, can you say, thread = nil? :)
Best,
- Joe
--
Joe Strout REAL Software, Inc.
Vote for REALbasic (twice!) in the LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Awards:
http://linux.sys-con.com/general/readerschoice.htm
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
A compiler is a tool for turning source code into error messages;
generating machine language bytes is just a fortuitous by-product!
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|