realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Solved (perhaps): Build on Mac, run on XP => Failed Assertion

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Solved (perhaps): Build on Mac, run on XP => Failed Assertion
From: Boris Segerstahl <boris dot segerstahl at pp dot inet dot fi>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:06:38 +0300
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <b70acbfda1e657c7d13b39003bd4e2cd at pp dot inet dot fi> <CB82F5C7-851C-48E7-988D-BCC76CF4CE41 at xhtmlsoft dot com> <d0198092df7610c528ed09e46f57a313 at pp dot inet dot fi> <A56F24DB-B7C7-424E-ADAC-86420DFCB27F at mac dot com>
I think the mystery is solved.
I used a test program for ContainerControls developed with 2005r1. In r1 you could not test "... isa ContainerControl". You had to use this strange leftover "EmbeddedWindowControl". I now replaced all "EmbeddedWindowControl" with "ContainerControl" and everything seems to run. What is strange is that mac still allows you to test for "EmbeddedWindowControl" but Win does not?

My old test app did not find the controls in a ContainerControl. The CC was in the controlcount and appeared in the loop through the window's controls. I have to rewrite it and check.

I have the impression that RS silenty changed something between r1 and r3 but did not put it in the release notes? There is, in my opinion, not any need for a bug report now unless the rewritten test finds something else.

Boris

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>