realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OOP

To: RB NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: OOP
From: Lars Jensen <larsjensen at gmail dot com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:02:37 -0800
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ttafu6CrqyhekgwSVY4m7mZzfbkDvdsmRzVNnpV2PFPJ3nNvpeT9TLPtbWRqUt+oqvw3GTjHA2fNGPf0AjsGkWqyU1386qAkDVNSxMWMNMBjwzYUrCXU1zOPkYQY7q6tCiYhWu2o/9qAKItNuh8cM9qjmT1vsDu9QN0itDRuu84=
> ...the RB language doesn't offer a way to formally
> organize classes. That would work though if the IDE
> enforced this through the folder organization.

I think that the folder metaphor is better left as an arbitrary
grouping technique than as an implicit specification of class access
rights. I would much rather that the access be explicitly declared.

lj
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>