realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: System font

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: System font
From: Aaron Ballman <aaron at realsoftware dot com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:18:50 -0600
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <BF8BF720 dot C913%cslittle at mac dot com> <43668D43 dot 3090801 at realsoftware dot com> <0F0030F1-3C5F-4163-AE74-8F6E16048DA7 at shaw dot ca> <436694BF dot 3020501 at realsoftware dot com> <5D1D1880-37E9-4CF4-A209-193D475B7A89 at shaw dot ca>
One of the things I noticed when I got my PC was that the user could change a lot of appearance items in Windows XP. This doesn't help the RB designer unless they choose their own fonts and not rely on the System fonts set by the user. Very unfriendly from a developers standpoint.

Hardly -- the developer has access to any user changeable setting in the system (whether it's via built-in RB APIs like SpecialFolder, etc) or via declares (like SystemColors in the WFS). The one thing the developer should never do is include their own fonts and use them since that's almost 100% guaranteed not to be what the user wants.

That sort of implies that it's best to stick with the System Fonts for Win32. At least, when the user modifies the appearance, the fonts will appear correct for that theme.

You should always stick to the system settings since that is what the user has selected for their OS. ;-)

~Aaron
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>