realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: (OFF) CodeWarrior 10--is CW relevant anymore?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: (OFF) CodeWarrior 10--is CW relevant anymore?
From: Sean Arney <sean at rulessoftware dot com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:45:41 -0600
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Thread-index: AcXedTO1ceaKjkpoEdq+qwANk2jfOA==
Thread-topic: (OFF) CodeWarrior 10--is CW relevant anymore?
 >> CodeWarrior 10 for Mac has just been announced.  The pro edition
>> even seems reasonably priced.
>> 
>> I'm confused a bit, because I thought CW was end-of-lifed with the
>> onset of the Intel Macs, and XCode ruled from now on.  Steve would
>> certainly have us think so. :-)
> 
> CodeWarrior can build CFM/PEF binaries which Xcode can't (and will
> never) do, and Xcode builds universal MachO (x86) binaries which
> CodeWarrior can't (and will never) do. So depending on your target(s)
> you may still need both. Keep in mind that Metrowerks sold their x86
> compilers and baring an event akin to pigs flying this will be the
> last CW release, so take Apple's "move to Xcode" mantra to heart.

FWIW, I use CW fairly often still.  I especially like the compare files - I
have yet to see better - that's actually why Im posting;  Does anyone know
of a better file compare?  I think CW will die pretty soon for me, but I
cant bear to part with their awesome compare.

-seanA


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>