At 1:02 PM -0800 10/31/05, Lars Jensen wrote:
At 2:22 PM -0500 10/31/05, Steve Roy wrote:
> ...the RB language doesn't offer a way to formally
organize classes. That would work though if the IDE
enforced this through the folder organization.
I think that the folder metaphor is better left as an arbitrary
grouping technique than as an implicit specification of class access
rights. I would much rather that the access be explicitly declared.
I agree with Steve that packages would be a great addition to Rb,
especially if you could have an external package (the same way you
can have an external class right now).
But... I also agree with Lars that the folder mechanism is best left
as an organizational tool.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|