| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Variant.Hash for objects is not unique in RB 2005 v4 |
| From: | "Joseph J. Strout" <joe at realsoftware dot com> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:17:19 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <BFB1BA0B dot 5ADE%Roph at kc dot rr dot com> <a06200704bfb2340c001e at [10 dot 0 dot 1 dot 4]> <B3AA3359-BA13-4EAC-914E-760CF841F303 at athenet dot net> |
At 11:07 AM -0600 11/29/05, Adam Ernst wrote: Does this mean using objects as keys in Dictionaries will not necessarily work as intended? No, it doesn't mean that. Dictionaries work fine; no dictionary has 2^32 bins to sort objects into, so they have to be prepared to handle collisions anyway (and they do). Best, - Joe -- Joe Strout REAL Software, Inc. Vote for REALbasic (twice!) in the LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Awards: http://linux.sys-con.com/general/readerschoice.htm _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: growing project while removing code lines, Joseph J. Strout |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: growing project while removing code lines, Vincent Kroll |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Variant.Hash for objects is not unique in RB 2005 v4, Adam Ernst |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Variant.Hash for objects is not unique in RB 2005 v4, Roph |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |