| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Doh! Variant.Hash is case insenstive Re: Variant.Hash for objects is not unique in RB 2005 v4 |
| From: | Mars Saxman <mars at realsoftware dot com> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:56:11 -0800 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <a06200701bfb372282d7f at 10 dot 0 dot 1 dot 4> <BFB32752 dot 5BD3%Roph at kc dot rr dot com> <89fe53800511301240l331fa4c4sf1813b0bb4ce5a4f at mail dot gmail dot com> |
On Nov 30, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Thomas Tempelmann wrote: some here suggest that you could encode your keys as Base64 so that you can store them like case-sensitive strings. But THAT is a big hit in performance Even worse, it doesn't even solve the problem; Base64 is a case- sensitive encoding. Mars Saxman REAL Software _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ANN] PDF Classes 2.0, Phil M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OT] PDF text protection for OS X, Tom Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Doh! Variant.Hash is case insenstive Re: Variant.Hash for objects is not unique in RB 2005 v4, Thomas Tempelmann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Doh! Variant.Hash is case insenstive Re: Variant.Hash for objects is not unique in RB 2005 v4, Phil M |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |