realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ANN] LeakCheck Classes 2005 Pre-Release v0.1a

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: [ANN] LeakCheck Classes 2005 Pre-Release v0.1a
From: Ryan Dary <nug at ryandary dot com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 13:25:00 -0800
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20051130201809 dot 11225 dot qmail at web54101 dot mail dot yahoo dot com> <8B53CBC1-E9B8-47C4-8665-F6DB5D6B351C at mobleybros dot com>
I don't think that would be an issue that would cause problems. Even if you had an instance to it, there is no way to "access" anything.

I suppose the IDE would allow you to "see" the properties and methods by using the auto-complete, but I'm not sure if that would be a problem.

It is probably something that should be considered before adding the functionality, but I agree it would be great to have.

- Ryan Dary

Phil M wrote:
On Nov 30, 2005, at 12:18 PM, Mark Nutter wrote:


The only objection that I have to that is... this would provide access to objects that are Protected or Private in scope and might be problematic for those that sell encrypted REALbasic solutions and possibly REALbasic plugins as well.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>