realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BinaryStream to MemoryBlock

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: BinaryStream to MemoryBlock
From: "Joseph J. Strout" <joe at strout dot net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:25:29 -0600
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <6C8CC36D-4DF1-4753-9508-A1C5E614330C at frontiernet dot net><0C793071-8B67-44BA- 8D52-88005902DE80 at mobleybros dot com> <2884A5EC-8669-4909-A863-70807231192D at frontiernet dot net> <00dd01c63c42$b037c1b0$1f00a8c0 at daniel>
At 9:40 AM +0100 2/28/06, Daniel Chiaramello wrote:

Maybe because it's not new MemoryBlock but newmemoryblock (single word)?

No, either one works fine.

But when somebody gives you a code snippet as an example, it is up to you to define the relevant object references involved, or to change them to match what's defined in your code. The snippet given was quite correct; it sounds like there was simply an error trying to apply it.

Best,
- Joe

--

Joseph J. Strout
joe at strout dot net
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>