realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: BinaryStream to MemoryBlock

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: BinaryStream to MemoryBlock
From: Phil M <phil at mobleybros dot com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:20:50 -0800
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <6C8CC36D-4DF1-4753-9508-A1C5E614330C at frontiernet dot net><0C793071-8B67-44BA- 8D52-88005902DE80 at mobleybros dot com> <2884A5EC-8669-4909-A863-70807231192D at frontiernet dot net> <00dd01c63c42$b037c1b0$1f00a8c0 at daniel> <a06200702c02a1ba4c5aa at [10 dot 71 dot 2 dot 34]>
On Feb 28, 2006, at 7:25 AM, Joseph J. Strout wrote:

Maybe because it's not new MemoryBlock but newmemoryblock (single word)?

No, either one works fine.

But when somebody gives you a code snippet as an example, it is up to you to define the relevant object references involved, or to change them to match what's defined in your code. The snippet given was quite correct; it sounds like there was simply an error trying to apply it.

The method that does not exist is the MemoryBlock.String() method... it should be StringValue(). Otherwise that code would work as well.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>