realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: known limitations of REALbasic?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: known limitations of REALbasic?
From: Andrea Suraci <andrew at ilexsoft dot net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:25:30 +0200
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20060424101055 dot BABBD12158CB at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <FB85FB5A-0D86-4F2A-A264-8BCAF2A9AB02 at elfdata dot com>
You make good points, but I think Carsten was asking for compiler-specific data, which only Real can provide since none of those numbers are documented.

I have spotted some of them in Mars' replies, like the stack size of methods and the maximum number of nested blocks (64?).

--
Andrea Suraci
www.ilexsoft.com


Theodore H. Smith wrote:

The biggest limitation is the RB editfield. It's got so many limitations I don't know where to start. Basically, don't expect to do anything much with the RB editfield :( A lot of text, or styling, or cool stuff like auto-complete/spell checking/find/undo, all of that isn't provided by RB. (Although Cocoa provides it.) RB's editfield doesn't even provide "Select All", for heaven's sake!!!

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>