realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: known limitations of REALbasic?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: known limitations of REALbasic?
From: Carsten Kobusch <carsten at merlin dot de>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:04:24 +0200
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20060424130455 dot 8B9A51216510 at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <B86C9507-169D-45C3-A2D2-8D41CEE021B5 at midsouth dot rr dot com>
Hey anybody out there

I did not want a discussion, i just wanted to know the (technical) limitations of realbasic. We should stop this thread, anybody who is interested in realbasics (technical) limitations can assign to the feedback id:

eijtkroi


Greetings,
Carsten


Am 25.04.2006 um 07:08 schrieb Dr. Scott Steinman:

RB's OO language is superior to Obj-C.

I wouldn't necessarily say that. It's comparing apples to oranges. Objective-C is a (usually) dynamically-typed, and dynamically dispatched language, more akin to Smalltalk and to scripting languages like Ruby. Objective-C allows for very flexible code and easy

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>