realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: known limitations of REALbasic?

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: known limitations of REALbasic?
From: Charles Yeomans <charles at declareSub dot com>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:07:30 -0400
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20060425162042 dot 9F6A2121A800 at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <EC3250BB-D74C-474E-9CB1-72A7AC1ACC20 at elfdata dot com>
Actually, Objective-C supports compile-time type-checking.

Charles Yeomans

On Apr 25, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Theodore H. Smith wrote:



Obj-C Minus points:
Bad memory Management
Syntax

RB Plus points:
Setter methods
Stronger typing, and type checking
Stronger checking all over, in fact! For example, RB checks interface compliancy.
Constructor arguments
The language makes normally hard things, easy. (even for loops are easier to write)

The main thing ObjC has over RB is the fact that it's a superset of C.

I wish we could have an RBC language. A superset of C that is RB :D

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>