| To: | REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: known limitations of REALbasic? |
| From: | Asher Dunn <asher at fireyesoftware dot com> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:37:22 -0400 |
| Delivered-to: | realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com |
| References: | <20060425201051 dot A896E121B35B at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <D3BB1BA9-40CF-41F7-BA6A-8631D2EB6D80 at elfdata dot com> <E8F45574-0CE8-4DD3-BE6A-51B80531725B at great-white-software dot com> |
On Apr 25, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Norman Palardy wrote: [init] isn't equivalent to new.Init is like RB's constructor (it can be called at any time)[alloc] is equivalent to new.RB's new is more like [alloc[ init ]] Yeah, I suppose so. But since +alloc creates the object and -init sets up state, I equated +alloc to 'new' an -init to a constructor() function. Perhaps it wasn't a good comparison. -- Asher _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FileType OS X RB2006r2, Hans-Georg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FileType OS X RB2006r2, Sven E Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: known limitations of REALbasic?, Norman Palardy |
| Next by Thread: | check online for a new version, Francis Gorge |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |