On 25 apr 2006, at 23.26, Jonathan Johnson wrote:
On Apr 25, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Sven E Olsson wrote:
extension to jpg .. and then you have an none valid file, that NOT
would be displayed in the OpenDialog box as MacType TEXT because
there is no MacType.
Of course, the reason to support MacTypes is because you can also
blindly remove the extension entirely. If you have a file that
*does* have a MacType that is correct, and you specify both a
MacType and extension, it will work properly in all cases. If you
simply specify a dummy MacType, it won't work if the file ends up
without an extension, because you didn't specify a MacType that
matched.
-Jon
This is very interesting, could an xml file (vaild) have another
extension that .xml or none?
Could an valid html file have an extension .txt ? or .jpg?
I think the answer is NO, and then the MacType could be dropped..
Sven E Olsson
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
From Tue 25 Apr 2006 15:40:25 -0600
Return-Path: <realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (209.198.132.125) by realsoftware.com
with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.1.3);
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:40:48 -0500
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 47FB4121B9C1; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:40:37 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Received: from hoggle.dreamhost.com (hoggle.dreamhost.com [66.33.197.5])
by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93427121B9AD
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:40:27 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-67-174-105-26.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.174.105.26])
by hoggle.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A0F731AA
for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:40:25 -0600
From: joe at strout dot net
To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
In-Reply-To: <222E24A3-25F9-4107-997C-094959F6085E at declareSub dot com>
X-Mailer: VerEx Email Gateway
Content-type: text/plain;
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20060425214025 dot 59A0F731AA at hoggle dot dreamhost dot com>
Subject: "for each" order (was Re: known limitations of REALbasic?)
X-BeenThere: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Errors-To: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Charles wrote:
Unless things have changed, 'for each' does not guarantee
iteration using the array order; I consider this a shortcoming, as it
is reasonable to expect that iteration over an ordered structure
respect that order.
I agree, as do at least 28 others:
<http://realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=hdcdbgfi>
I bet this feedback report wins the
"most-popular-feature-request-that-takes-no-work-at-all-to-implement" award.
:) Feel free to sign on if you agree a dependable order would be nice.
Best,
- Joe
--
Joe Strout -- joe at strout dot net
Verified Express, LLC "Making the Internet a Better Place"
http://www.verex.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
|