realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: FileType OS X RB2006r2

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: FileType OS X RB2006r2
From: Hans-Georg <pantarei at mac dot com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:53:11 +0200
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20060425204130 dot BEBF8731AE at hoggle dot dreamhost dot com> <19ED2A60-9CA9-483E-A594-5B1A2EC61E07 at xhtmlsoft dot com> <3D4B2126-465B-43F1-AB4D-F8622C29A6E6 at realsoftware dot com> <3CDC428E-3F02-4E80-B425-0DE71E391F9E at xhtmlsoft dot com> <84297D2F-407F-4692-A685-E7DD59475EA9 at realsoftware dot com> <5C6F0D22-6E02-4D1B-8E12-E30834058C75 at xhtmlsoft dot com>
Am 26.04.2006 um 00:40 schrieb Sven E Olsson:

But i begin to see an explanation, many on this list looks to say if the MacType = TEXT, then all files are valid (hrml, xhtml,xml.rss, css, txt, plist) files, with or without extension.

Good observation. And I am drowning in all these different text file types, in all my hmtl, xml, tex, gnuplot, R and... files. I guess most to nearly all file formats developed in time of the internet are text files now.

No Mac is an island.

Hans-Georg



_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>