Re: Just curious.......

[Chris Little <cslittle at mac dot com>]

on 4/27/06 5:52 AM, Dr Gerard Hammond at g dot hammond at garvan dot org dot au 
wrote:

> At 9:45 AM +0100 27/4/06, Mark O'Neill wrote:
>> Thanks to all who replied about 5.5.5 vs RB2006r2.
>> 
>> I have a better understanding as to why some now
>> stick to 5.5.5. So, my next question is...
>> 
>> I'm nearly finished writing a cross-platform toolbar class
>> for my app, which I was thinking of releasing for
>> others to use and it was coded in RB2006r2. Should
>> I download 5.5.5 and "fix" it so the classes work in
>> 5.5.5 as well as RB2006r2 (probably the main problems
>> would be default property values?) or just say on
>> the download that it requires RB2006r2 or greater?
> 
> 
> I am using RB55 for real projects - ie paid consulting - but using
> RB2006 for my private projects.
> 
> I suspect that RB 55 will be phased out by RB2006r3/4. ie the next
> three/five months.
> Anybody using RB55 by Sept/Oct will not buy your software so don't
> bother with them.

I agree Gerard.  Once RB can generate Universal Binaries then that version
of RB will be the new minimum version for development.

Chris


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>