realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Just curious.......

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: Just curious.......
From: Joe Huber <joehuber at talasoft dot com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:46:32 -0700
Cc: Emile Schwarz <emile dot a dot schwarz at wanadoo dot fr>
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20060428062507 dot 899171227098 at lists dot realsoftware dot com> <44523CB2 dot 3050408 at wanadoo dot fr>
At 6:02 PM +0200 4/28/06, Emile Schwarz wrote:
Subject: Re: Just curious.......
From: "Tomis E." <gostcoder at yahoo dot com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:56:46 -0700 (PDT)

RB5.5 consistently builds smaller faster apps than RB2006

Sorry pal, wrong way:

REALbasic 200x consistently builds larger slower apps than RB 5.5.5; and I was not really happy by the large and slow of RB 5.5.5 created applications...

Emile

First, you realize you both are saying the same thing right?

Secondly, blanket statements like that aren't always accurate. I agree that the 200x IDE is big and slow. However my built apps are a LOT faster in 2006 than they were in 5.5, primarily due to better thread handling.

Anyone who cares about performance should do their own benchmarks on their own app and its particular set of performance bottlenecks.

Regards,
Joe Huber
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>