realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ServerSockets

To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Subject: Re: ServerSockets
From: Stefan Pantke <seaside dot ki at mac dot com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:33:16 +0200
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <C09C69E5 dot 37285%lists at redcort dot com>

Times to establish connections is much longer than in other
languages. Review the archis. I talked about this issue in
the context of the web-server Ronald V. built and the one I
wrote.

Am 26.05.2006 um 17:16 schrieb Keith DeLong:

Hi Deane,
I use the ServerSockets without problems. Any chance you're using a local instance of the ServerSocket and it's going out of scope at the end of your
method?

Keith DeLong

Hey Guys,

Am I completely missing something? I've tested a basic server socket,
receives a connection, sends a tiny response and closes down. Taking like 120ms(0.12s) all up. VB, winsock control looking at like 14ms (0.014s) to
do the same thing. Is this something that I'm not going to be able to
improve using RB's standard sockets? I'm doing the bare minimum (4 lines of code) to get the RB side going. That may be my problem, I just don't
know enough.

Thanks,
Deane Venske


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>