Re: ServerSockets

["Deane Venske" <deane dot list at eduss dot com>]

Hi Keith,

I'm not having problems at all, everything works just fine. The issue is  
the speed of the establishment of comms. Stephen has at least confirmed  
it's not me and is a known problem, so I'm going to worry too much over  
it. If it becomes a concern for my clients down the track I may just need  
to write my service in C++.
Thanks,
Deane

> Hi Deane,
> I use the ServerSockets without problems. Any chance you're using a local
> instance of the ServerSocket and it's going out of scope at the end of  
> your
> method?
>
> Keith DeLong
>
> > Hey Guys,
> >
> > Am I completely missing something? I've tested a basic server socket,
> > receives a connection, sends a tiny response and closes down. Taking  
> > like
> > 120ms(0.12s) all up. VB, winsock control looking at like 14ms(0.014s) to
> > do the same thing. Is this something that I'm not going to be able to
> > improve using RB's standard sockets? I'm doing the bare minimum (4 lines
> > of code) to get the RB side going. That may be my problem, I just don't
> > know enough.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Deane Venske
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
>
> Search the archives of this list here:
> <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>