realbasic-nug
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: realbasic-nug Digest, Vol 26, Issue 89

To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Subject: Re: realbasic-nug Digest, Vol 26, Issue 89
From: Peter Mitchell <pmitchell at jonoke dot com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 11:39:17 -0600
Delivered-to: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-to: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
References: <20060530170036 dot 5FCFE12B4E70 at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
I just did a quick test on an Intel Duo Mac with an application using the HID bundle to access an XKeys device. It worked for me.

Peter

On May-30-06, at 11:00 AM, realbasic-nug- request at lists dot realsoftware dot com wrote:

No one tried it?

Would love to give the customer a go / no go answer soon ;)

Best,

James
On 29/05/2006, at 2:24 PM, James Mullins wrote:

Hi guys,

I have to port an application over to an intel mac and was
wondering if anyone knows if the HID bundle works on intel macs....
Basically I just want access to an external joystick.


Best,

James


_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


From  Tue 30 May 2006 13:45:25 -0600
Return-Path: <realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
X-Original-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: listarchive at realsoftware dot com
Received: by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix, from userid 1037)
        id 86A7B5543D8; Tue, 30 May 2006 12:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on www.realsoftware.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME,
        RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=3.1.1
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (lists.realsoftware.com [209.198.132.125])
        by xmail.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC355543D1;
        Tue, 30 May 2006 12:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.realsoftware.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 1F11C12B560E; Tue, 30 May 2006 14:45:31 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Delivered-To: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Received: from swarthymail-a1.dreamhost.com (mailbigip.dreamhost.com
        [208.97.132.5])
        by lists.realsoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4982512B5600
        for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
        Tue, 30 May 2006 14:45:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-67-174-105-26.hsd1.co.comcast.net [67.174.105.26])
        by swarthymail-a1.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9EC90D5C
        for <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>;
        Tue, 30 May 2006 12:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 13:45:25 -0600
From: joe at strout dot net
To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
In-Reply-To: <4D8F0CC4-DC55-4312-82B5-3D4BE197AE39 at oofile dot com dot au>
X-Mailer: VerEx Email Gateway
Content-type: text/plain;
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20060530194525 dot 4F9EC90D5C at swarthymail-a1 dot dreamhost dot 
com>
Subject: Re: OT: Reverse Debugging
X-BeenThere: realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: REALbasic NUG <realbasic-nug at lists dot realsoftware dot com>
Sender: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com
Errors-To: realbasic-nug-bounces at lists dot realsoftware dot com

On May 27, 2006, at 02:11 UTC, Andy Dent wrote:

for exactly the same reasons I am profoundly skeptical about this reverse debugger.

I can verify that such things exist (I wrote an article on Leonardo for MacTech 
years ago), at least for limited environments.  I can perhaps also get away 
with saying that it's something I've been interested interested in even before 
I started working at REAL Software, which (some of you old-timers may remember) 
was before we started designing the new compiler and debugger.  It is 
theoretically possible to add such a feature to REALbasic.  However, in a 
real-world environment, such reversible execution (as I have known it to be 
called) is quite expensive, and if I had to hazard a personal guess, I'd say 
that it would be a very long time before the cost/benefit ratio of this feature 
would outweigh other features people want.

Best,
- Joe

--
Joe Strout -- joe at strout dot net
Verified Express, LLC     "Making the Internet a Better Place"
http://www.verex.com/

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>